<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Digital Photo Frame</title>
	<link>http://clientk.com/2007/10/29/the-digital-photo-frame/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://clientk.com/2007/10/29/the-digital-photo-frame/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://clientk.com/2007/10/29/the-digital-photo-frame/#comment-839</guid>
		<description>Ummmm, maybe if this was 1998.  The digital photo frame was probably one of the worst novelties of yester-year to fail to catch on.

I still laugh when I  think back to Sony's $900 digital frame (with like a 7", not-so-great-looking screen) setup in an elaborate booth/display in every Circuit City in the country.  They were hard pushing their "Memory Stick Media" at that time and tried, unsuccessfully to sell consumers on the notion that their products were worth that much, simply for the sake of novelty and originality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummmm, maybe if this was 1998.  The digital photo frame was probably one of the worst novelties of yester-year to fail to catch on.</p>
<p>I still laugh when I  think back to Sony&#8217;s $900 digital frame (with like a 7&#8243;, not-so-great-looking screen) setup in an elaborate booth/display in every Circuit City in the country.  They were hard pushing their &#8220;Memory Stick Media&#8221; at that time and tried, unsuccessfully to sell consumers on the notion that their products were worth that much, simply for the sake of novelty and originality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
